Red Dead Redemption 2 was one of the most highly-detailed games that year when it first came out in 2018, with extensively interacting systems—including realistic animal behaviour. While some critics asked if that experience was worth the human cost of “death march” crunch needed to develop it, it had an additional surprising outcome. According to a paper published for the ‘People and Nature’ journal, players who had played either Red Dead Redemption 2 or Red Dead Online were better at identifying real life animals than those who hadn’t.
The study asked over 500 self-selected gamers to name specific animals, first with a blank text field and then with a multiple choice. The researchers left out “charismatic megafauna” like wolves or bears, opting for creatures like the little egret, and the steelhead trout—these animals being ones that appear in the games.
PCGamer latest
Source link
Related Post:
- Grand Theft Auto V Has Shipped Over 145 Million Units; Red Dead Redemption 2 at Over 37 Million
- Grand Theft Auto V Has Shipped Over 150 Million Units; Red Dead Redemption 2 at Over 38 Million
- Red Dead Redemption 2, Nioh 2, Judgment – PlayStation.Blog
- Red Dead Redemption 2, Judgment and Nioh 2 come to PlayStation Now in July
- Red Dead Redemption 2 Adds DLSS Support, Trailer Touts Significant Performance Improvements
- Red Dead Redemption 2 Gets Its Own VR Mod
- Red Dead Redemption 2 VR Conversion Mod Gets Early Access Release
- This Red Dead Redemption 2 mod lets you have your very own dog
- D’Angelo and Rhiannon Giddens Joining The Songs of Red Dead Redemption 2 Concert
- DLSS is coming to Doom Eternal and Red Dead Redemption 2 next week